News

The housing affordability crisis in the United States has emerged as a significant issue, affecting individuals across all age demographics, including those in their 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s. This widespread challenge impacts personal financial stability and has far-reaching consequences for the broader economy, particularly in regions where employees cannot afford to live near their workplaces. Addressing this crisis requires a comprehensive understanding of its effects on different age groups and the implementation of multifaceted solutions.

Watch The Full Podcast

Generational Impacts of Housing Affordability

Individuals in Their 40s and 50s

For individuals in their 40s and 50s, traditionally considered peak earning years, the housing affordability crisis presents unique challenges. Many in this cohort are balancing mortgage payments, supporting children, and saving for retirement. However, escalating housing costs have strained these financial responsibilities.

A study by the Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) at Harvard University highlights that between 2000 and 2020, median rents rose faster than median household incomes in 88% of U.S. counties, affecting 97% of the population. This trend has led to increased housing cost burdens among middle-aged adults, forcing some to allocate a larger portion of their income to housing expenses, thereby reducing their capacity to save for retirement or invest in their children’s education.

Moreover, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports that the median age of first-time homebuyers has risen to 38, the highest on record. This shift indicates that many individuals are delaying homeownership until their late 30s or early 40s, often due to affordability issues. Consequently, those in their 40s and 50s may find less equity built up in their homes as they approach retirement, potentially compromising their financial stability in later years.

Older adults in their 60s and 70s are not immune to the housing affordability crisis. Many retirees live on fixed incomes, making them particularly vulnerable to rising housing costs. The AARP Public Policy Institute found that nearly 10 million households headed by individuals aged 65 and older are housing cost-burdened, spending more than 30% of their income on housing. This financial strain can lead to difficult choices between housing, healthcare, and other essential needs.

Additionally, a report by the Institute for Housing Studies at DePaul University indicates that in Chicago, households headed by older adults represent a large and rapidly growing share of the population. This demographic shift necessitates a focus on developing housing solutions that cater to the specific needs of older adults, including accessibility features and proximity to healthcare services.

Economic Consequences of Housing Inaccessibility

Workforce Shortages and Spatial Mismatch

In areas with skyrocketing housing costs, businesses often struggle to attract and retain employees. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC), workers earning the federal minimum wage cannot afford a two-bedroom apartment in any U.S. state. Even workers earning significantly more than minimum wage face affordability challenges in high-cost metro areas like San Francisco, New York City, and Boston.

The inability to live near their workplaces forces employees to either endure long, costly commutes or decline job opportunities altogether. This phenomenon, often called “spatial mismatch,” reduces labor market efficiency and leaves businesses understaffed, particularly in critical industries such as healthcare, education, and public services. A study by the Urban Institute found that healthcare facilities in high-cost regions are experiencing critical staffing shortages due to housing inaccessibility, impacting the quality of care provided to residents.

Productivity Losses and Business Impact

When employees cannot afford to live near their jobs, businesses face increased turnover, higher recruitment costs, and lower productivity. According to the American Planning Association (APA), companies in expensive regions often struggle to fill vacancies, especially for lower-wage positions critical to operations. This labor shortage ultimately reduces output and profitability, impacting the local and national economy.

Furthermore, long commutes, which are a direct result of housing unaffordability, contribute to worker burnout and decreased productivity. The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found that long commutes cost the U.S. economy billions annually in lost productivity and health-related expenditures.

Stagnant Economic Growth in High-Cost Areas

High housing costs also deter potential residents from moving to economically vibrant regions, slowing growth and innovation. Research from the Brookings Institution reveals that regions with high housing costs often experience slower population growth, leading to reduced consumer spending and weaker local economies.

Local governments are also affected, as they depend on a stable workforce and population to maintain tax revenue. When housing costs push workers and families out of an area, cities face declining revenue streams, limiting their ability to invest in infrastructure, education, and public services.

Potential Solutions to the Housing Affordability Crisis

Addressing the housing affordability crisis requires immediate and long-term strategies tailored to diverse age groups and economic challenges. Below are key solutions that can alleviate the issue while promoting equity and sustainability.

Utilizing Hidden Housing Stock Through Room Sharing

Room sharing unlocks existing housing stock by encouraging homeowners to rent unused rooms. This approach offers affordable living options for renters while providing homeowners with supplemental income to offset rising costs.

Shifting Zoning Codes for Diverse Housing

Restrictive zoning laws hinder affordable housing development by prioritizing single-family homes. Updating zoning codes to allow duplexes, townhomes, and accessory dwelling units (ADUs) creates diverse, cost-effective housing options. Cities like Portland and Minneapolis have demonstrated success by legalizing ADUs and enabling higher-density developments. Inclusionary zoning policies, which require developers to include affordable units, further ensure equitable housing growth.

Building More Multifamily Housing

Expanding multifamily housing addresses the chronic shortage of affordable units. Apartments, condominiums, and mixed-use developments efficiently use land and provide cost-effective living options. Incentives like reduced permitting fees and tax breaks can encourage developers to build multifamily projects faster. Modular construction and small-scale units, like studio apartments, also make multifamily housing more accessible to lower-income residents.

Supporting Community and Policy Initiatives

Collaborative approaches, like public-private partnerships and community land trusts, can further expand affordable housing. Education campaigns promoting the benefits of diverse housing types help reduce opposition to new developments and zoning changes, paving the way for inclusive solutions.

By combining these strategies, commercial real estate stakeholders, cities, and communities can tackle the housing crisis while fostering economic growth and ensuring housing stability for all demographics.